Faster, cheaperclinical trials.
We rebuild half of a trial’s control group from real medical records. Sponsors recruit fewer patients, spend less, and reach a readout sooner. Benchmarked first in psychiatry, where the outcomes live in clinical notes.
One control arm of a late-stage trial, 1,000 patients, 25 to a block. Footprint counts patients, height is what each one costs.
Conventional
With Sapien
1,000 recruited
500 recruited
500 rebuilt from records
The model reads EHR, Clinical notes, Labs, Imaging
The control group is the bottleneck.
A late-stage trial recruits about 2,000 patients, and half receive a placebo. Enrolling those control patients is the slowest, most expensive part of the study.
To recruit one patient the traditional way.
Fall short of their enrollment target.
Open, then never recruit a single patient.
We have bought datasets for over $70M for other studies. For this, they are practically useless.
Recruit half. Rebuild the rest.
We rebuild half of the control group from real medical records, as trial-grade synthetic patients. The sponsor recruits fewer people, and every later trial reuses the cohort at lower cost.
Scattered encounters resolved into one longitudinal patient timeline.
Merged fromEHRClinical notesLabsImaging
Assembled once, drawn on by every trial. Cost falls with each one.
Matched to your inclusion and exclusion criteria, rather than rebuilt for each study.
One glyph = 6 patients · Illustrative
Every control patient we rebuild instead of recruit.
Rebuilt from real records, item-level traceable.
For the portion of the arm we reconstruct.
Measured against frontier models.
Our reconstruction method is described in a public paper and measured on the Psych-ECA benchmark. On semi-synthetic data its prediction bands covered the true outcome 93 to 96 percent of the time, at or above the nominal 90 percent target.
Empirical coverage of nominal 90% prediction bands. Gradient boosting reached 87 to 88%. Benchmark results on semi-synthetic data, not clinical validation.
The precedent is already there.
Regulators have accepted external and in-silico controls for a decade. The methods only recently became good enough for psychiatry, where the outcomes are subjective.
- 201621st Century Cures Act, RWE program
- 2022FDA Modernization Act 2.0, AI and in-silico methods
- 2023FDA draft guidance, externally controlled trials
- NowThe technology is ready for psychiatry
About $170B of drug sales lose patent protection by the early 2030s. Sponsors need cheaper, faster trials to keep pipelines full.
Psychiatry came last because its outcomes live in notes. That is exactly the problem our method was built to solve.
Team

IIT Delhi. Biotech, gene therapy, and microfluidics.

BITS Pilani. Machine learning for Turing-award labs in the US.
Advisors affiliated with Pfizer, GSK, Tufts, Johns Hopkins, Imperial, and UCL.
Fewer patients.
Faster readout.
A short call to map your program onto a rebuilt control arm. No raw records leave the source.